<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DANNY HOUK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dannyhouk.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dannyhouk.com</link>
	<description>pilgrim</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Helvetica and the &#8220;Ought&#8221; of Good Design by TonyC</title>
		<link>http://dannyhouk.com/helvetica-and-the-ought-of-good-design/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 02:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannyhouk.com/?p=254#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I thought the Helvetica documentary was pretty good (Yay Netflix for making such things available!).  I enjoyed it even more having lived in Switzerland for a couple of years.

I agree with you - some design is strongly expressive, even when using a purposefully inexpressive face like helvetica.  Other designs seem to fade into the background and lack expression, even when using &#039;expressive&#039; faces - this seems truer (to me) for those using (trendy) faces that have become ubiquitous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Helvetica documentary was pretty good (Yay Netflix for making such things available!).  I enjoyed it even more having lived in Switzerland for a couple of years.</p>
<p>I agree with you &#8211; some design is strongly expressive, even when using a purposefully inexpressive face like helvetica.  Other designs seem to fade into the background and lack expression, even when using &#8216;expressive&#8217; faces &#8211; this seems truer (to me) for those using (trendy) faces that have become ubiquitous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Helvetica and the &#8220;Ought&#8221; of Good Design by Danny</title>
		<link>http://dannyhouk.com/helvetica-and-the-ought-of-good-design/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannyhouk.com/?p=254#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Robin,

Thanks for stopping by and leaving your thoughts. Looking forward to reading more of your blog posts as well :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and leaving your thoughts. Looking forward to reading more of your blog posts as well :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Helvetica and the &#8220;Ought&#8221; of Good Design by Robin Bastien</title>
		<link>http://dannyhouk.com/helvetica-and-the-ought-of-good-design/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Bastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannyhouk.com/?p=254#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Hey Danny, cheers for the blog comment, and this is a great discussion-oriented post.  

What I enjoyed about the Helvetica documentary apart from the history and legacy of the font-face itself is the fact that they interviewed both supporters and non-supporters of it, so you get a two-sided approach. 

Personally I think that, like relationships, every font is calling for a layout and the layout is calling for a font. Helvetica is a perfect match over many different mediums - web, print, mobile, and even cookie cutters now. I do think it&#039;s a timeless font that has been brought to perfection, although there are times when it&#039;s not suitable and other fonts can take the merit. 

I see design *nearly* as something that is entirely subjective, and a designer chooses to do things for specific reasons, which allows a client to trust their judgment. It&#039;s never good to marry specific ideas / design concepts, but take those ideas / concepts into account wherever they work best. 

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Danny, cheers for the blog comment, and this is a great discussion-oriented post.  </p>
<p>What I enjoyed about the Helvetica documentary apart from the history and legacy of the font-face itself is the fact that they interviewed both supporters and non-supporters of it, so you get a two-sided approach. </p>
<p>Personally I think that, like relationships, every font is calling for a layout and the layout is calling for a font. Helvetica is a perfect match over many different mediums &#8211; web, print, mobile, and even cookie cutters now. I do think it&#8217;s a timeless font that has been brought to perfection, although there are times when it&#8217;s not suitable and other fonts can take the merit. </p>
<p>I see design *nearly* as something that is entirely subjective, and a designer chooses to do things for specific reasons, which allows a client to trust their judgment. It&#8217;s never good to marry specific ideas / design concepts, but take those ideas / concepts into account wherever they work best. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Helvetica and the &#8220;Ought&#8221; of Good Design by Danny</title>
		<link>http://dannyhouk.com/helvetica-and-the-ought-of-good-design/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannyhouk.com/?p=254#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks... and ditto on looking at design based on context, that&#039;s the best approach to critiquing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230; and ditto on looking at design based on context, that&#8217;s the best approach to critiquing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Helvetica and the &#8220;Ought&#8221; of Good Design by Dan Morton</title>
		<link>http://dannyhouk.com/helvetica-and-the-ought-of-good-design/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannyhouk.com/?p=254#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention in this thought-provoking post. I, like you, tend to dismiss the beliefs that fonts should either always be the centerpiece or completely complementary. I tend to take each design on its own merit - the target audience, its usage, what it&#039;s trying to accomplish, and most importantly, its message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention in this thought-provoking post. I, like you, tend to dismiss the beliefs that fonts should either always be the centerpiece or completely complementary. I tend to take each design on its own merit &#8211; the target audience, its usage, what it&#8217;s trying to accomplish, and most importantly, its message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

